May 16, 2009

Is Gambling the New Political Fundraiser?

Philadelphia, PA
July 4, 2009
World Press Association

The new ‘third party’ calling itself the Practical Party , has announced a controversial new method for raising funds today; online gambling. They will be using the methodology behind sports betting to allow customers to bet on politics. A person can go the website, and either search for a politician or bill by name, or pick one off of the board and then bet on the outcome.

I caught up with party founder, Ben Frank, in Atlantic City where he was promoting the Practical Party. He explained, “People want to support their nation, and they want to get something back, and they like to gamble. This gives them all three. The money they lose supports the party, and the money they win supports them. So they help the party and each other at the same time. Plus, it brings excitement into the usually dull political process. I mean, who wants to follow H.R. 19127? Or Rep. Johnson as he filibusters the right to filibuster? But if you have money on it, now it is interesting. I bet C-SPAN’s ratings go way up as a result. What’s more, we don’t owe a debt to any donors.”

When asked why the future of our nation wasn’t exciting enough, Mr. Frank had no answer. Nor do he respond directly to a question that pointed out that we already have money in the game in the form of taxes. He simply waved it off and replied, “Your talking about esoteric ideals that most people can’t relate to, this is real, hands-on stuff.”

The gambling fundraiser has been active for 2 weeks and has raised over $30,000.00 dollars so far. They have paid out only $2000.00 in winnings at the time this article went to print. Their online membership list is currently at 2500 signatures.

When asked about his party’s platform, Mr. Frank gave one of his few straight answers. “The party has a 5 point platform: 1) Lawyers should not be allowed to be politicians as it is a conflict of interest, 2) enact the Fair Tax, 3) pass the balanced budget amendment, 4) limit our military to the defense of the borders of the United States, and 5) remove all redundant operations from the government. Doing those 5 things will dramatically reduce corruption and spending in the United States government and allow the people to get back to the business of building a great civilization.”

Fundraising efforts appear to be for the 2012 election, although they currently have no candidates, nor are they registered in any states as a recognized political party. Mr. Frank claims the money he is raising is to support organizing that effort. However, with $30 thousand already in the bank, one has to wonder what they are waiting on.

JD Adler
WPA



April 29, 2009

Robin Hood Sentenced to Life in Prison

Philadelphia, PA
World Press Association
July 4th, 2009

The four men known as the ‘Robin Hood Gang’, were brought into court for a hearing today; David Lang age 28, Peter Hash age 32, Steven Cotes age 27, and Michael Reed age 37. This should have been the stage of the proceeding where they heard the charges against them, declared their pleas, and had a date set for trial. However, true to form, this went anything but they way it should have.

They refused legal counsel, claiming that they would be better off representing themselves than having “some lackey of the corrupt state set them up for compromising their rights.” When presented with the charges against them, they refused to plea, claiming they did not recognize a federal court‘s jurisdiction over them as “the Constitution has been violated so many times in so many ways the Federal government is no longer a legitimate body.” The judge, the Hon. Francis Le Plume, explained to the defendants that failure to plead would be viewed by the court as a de facto plea of ‘no contest’ and then asked each individual how they plead. They did not waiver from their stance. He then instructed the court recorder to officially record pleas of no contest to the 5 felony charges being leveled against each of the men, and summarily sentenced them to 150 years in prison each.

There has been some debate over whether Judge Le Plume overreached the authority of the bench, but without attorneys to defend them, the men were incapable of mounting any legal counter argument at the time. Whether this ruling will withstand appeal, or if there will even be an appeal, remains to be seen. At this time the four men remain in the Federal Detention Center in Philadelphia awaiting assignment to a prison.

Crowds had gathered outside the courthouse cheering for the ‘heroes of the people’ and decrying the ‘tyrants of the oligarchy’ as their signs read. Yet none of them appreciated the poetry of a group of men who demanded accountability for crimes being sent to jail for vigilantism. Their rather grandiose manifesto demanded a more organized society with greater accountability for law and order. Yet somehow they hoped to accomplish that through violence done under cover of night, hidden behind masks. Seldom is hypocrisy the key to leading real social change.

For several months these men enacted our darkest desires against the worst elements of our high society. We secretly praised them for acting out our revenge. However, we also are all now sighing a breathe of relief to know that these marauders are removed from the social landscape. Let us now join together in building the society we desire.

JD Adler
WPA

April 25, 2009

Robin Hood Gang Arrested

Ephrata, Lancaster County, PA.
World Press Association
June 12, 2009

During a swift, surgical raid on an abandoned fire engine factory, the FBI arrested the “Robin Hood Gang’ yesterday evening. The building had been closed in May when La France condensed its operations to its central location in South Carolina. According to FBI sources who asked to remain unnamed the gang had been moving through a series of abandoned commercial locations, briefly utilizing one as a camp, and then moving on. The recent release of a manifesto by the gang was the clue that allowed the FBI to track to them to Ephrata prior to their departure. Ironically, the recent timing of the factory’s closing was what clued the FBI to the unusual nature of activity in that location.

A press conference was given by Special Agent Tom Riggens who lead the investigation these last few months, under much scrutiny and a great deal of derision. No questions were taken.

“Several months ago I promised you that these traitors would be brought to justice, and today we delivered on that promise. Before anything else, I wish to commend the agents on my team, and those members of law enforcement who assisted us. It was truly thankless and exhausting work, but we did not relent because we knew it was God’s work….

“We have compiled sufficient evidence to charge these four men with breaking and entering, armed robbery, arson, assault, and kidnapping. I believe they should be tried for treason and sedition as well, but those are more complex charges that fall in the jurisdiction of the Attorney General. Regardless of the labels applied to their crimes, Americans can rest assured they will be punished for their crimes…”

The prisoners were transferred under heavy guard to the Federal Detention Center in Philadelphia, PA to await arraignment. When they arrived this morning there were already over 500 protesters outside the facility with signs demanding everything from “Free Robin Hood” to “Death to Terrorists”.

Whatever does happen to these men, their actions have starkly defined the divisions in America. What has become most apparent to this reporter, however, is what the sides have in common. Always the most extreme is argued from an entrenched position that does not allow for the possibility that the ‘other’ might have something to offer. Nowhere is the moderate argument. Nowhere is the voice of reason. Perhaps President Washington was correct when he said, “It [partisan politics] agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, [and] foments occasionally riot and insurrection.”

JD Adler
WPA


April 20, 2009

An Open Letter to Our Fellow Citizens,


We are the group that the media has nicknamed ‘modern day Robin Hoods’, whether or not that moniker applies we will leave for you to decide. Last night we destroyed the presses of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing in what shall be our final strike of retribution against the corrupt financial network that has done so much harm to us all. Our goal was not to bring vigilante justice to each and every member of the plutocracy which has defrauded us all, but to express to those in the plutocracy that co-opting the legal system does not guarantee them impunity. ‘We the People’ will not be passive victims. Those in charge must understand we are serious when we say the time is now for fundamental change.

We are not revolutionaries, nor are we traitors; we are patriotic citizens who saw those with wealth corrupting those with power while those who work to maintain the nation suffer the consequences of their amorality. This has always been the case, in every nation, in every period of history; a small group prospers off the effort of the rest of the population. The problem is not capitalism, socialism, liberalism, conservatism or any other –isms.

The problem is that while this nation is philosophically “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” those who control the money are those people. Let us be clear, this is not some vast villainous conspiracy where mustachioed men sit in back rooms smoking cigars and laughing at the ignorant proletariat they have enslaved. No, this is a system that has developed organically over the centuries and has been allowed to continue due to a willful refusal by us all to conduct any sort of meaningful social self-examination.

Banks and business are in a partnership, naturally, to keep each other strong. Any organization as large as a government has to borrow money for its budget. Even if they have a zero deficit, they borrow at the beginning of the year and pay it off at the end as any business would. Due to their size they will borrow from the largest banks, who will also be partnered with the largest businesses. Which creates a natural partnership of common interests between big business, big banks, and big government in which millions of individual citizens cannot hope to have a serious voice.

That being the case, how do we change the equation to our favor? As a group, the electorate invests more money into the government than any other group. We should have the most influence. However our money is not seen as an investment, it is seen as the government’s for the taking, at whatever numbers the administration of the moment chooses to set. Meanwhile those in government are evaluated only by what they wish to do, not on their performance. Nor are they subject to accountability for their actions when they violate the public trust. This must change.

First, we must assess the value of the United States as if it were a corporation; based on property, income, overhead, etc. We then issue 2 stocks, A and B. ‘A’ stocks are issued to all citizens, are non-transferable, revert to the government upon death, and carry a vote. ‘B’ stocks are the publicly traded stock known as the dollar, and carry no vote. Now every citizen is an equal investor in their nation, and the dollar is backed by real value.

Second, we must change the manner in which we elect our government. We need accountability and we need politicians to receive their rewards on the job, not from lobbyists after they leave office. Politicians will be elected to an office that has no end date, just like any other job. You may retire, quit, transfer, or be fired. Every X number of years the constituency will hold a referendum in which they will choose between a large bonus (e.g. 10%), a small bonus (e.g. 3%), no bonus, or no confidence. The base salary would remain the same unless a referendum changed it. If the majority votes no confidence, an election must be held.

Third, taxes cannot be the sole income of our government, and borrowing from other nations is not an acceptable supplement. This government must find a way to raise money. We do not want the government competing in the private economy either. So we need to legally limit the government to one for-profit business that is logical for us to be conducting as a nation. Therefore, the government will nationalize the import/export business and run it for profit, with the local offices being run as franchises. The security advantages to the government controlling everything coming across the border are obvious. This is a legitimate business for the government to take over because the border belongs to all of us, therefore we should all enjoy whatever profits are made from goods crossing it. This will not replace 100% of taxes, but it will offset them significantly. We also need to change the personal income tax to a value added tax so that people are choosing to pay the amount they can afford when they choose to make a purchase.

Fourth, we must define the role of government in stricter terms so that we know exactly what to expect, and they know exactly what is expected of them. The concept of the Social Contract is that people are willing to sacrifice some degree of their natural sovereignty in exchange for a cooperative effort to guarantee certain necessities. We need to specify what those necessities are for us, and make that the not for profit business of the government. I would envision such a list consisting of; police, fire, EMS, justice, transportation, communication and energy infrastructure, coinage of money, defense of the nation, and healthcare. Whatever list the populace agrees to, it must be specific and the crime of a politician reaching beyond their legal powers should be treason.

All of this can be accomplished with a bill of amendments to our current Constitution. We do not need to start over, or revolt, all we need is to do the one thing that is key to survival… adapt. We all complain about the same problems (accountability, transparency, corruption) and we all know what we expect from the solutions. All that is required is adapting our current system to those expectations. It takes courage to change from what you have always known, but if what you have always known isn’t working... what does it take to stay with it?


Citizen A

April 19, 2009

BEP Destroyed, US Dollar out of Print

Washington, DC
World Press Association
May 28, 2009

After a pause in activity, the ‘Robin Hood Gang’ again struck last night. This time at the very heart of our financial system, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). The BEP, located in Washington, DC and Fort Worth, TX, is responsible for the printing of all United States paper money as well as some stamps, securities, and official awards. Coinage, alternately, is made by the US mint.

It is unknown how they were able to access the buildings, but at exactly 3:30 am EST last night. Explosions rocked both buildings destroying the printing presses and the inventory of paper and ink currently on hand. Witnesses describe a plume of smoke and flames rising into the air at least thirty feet above the height of the roof.

“The colors were spectacular,” a security guard from the BEP annex across the street said, “all that ink and chemically treated paper burned in the most magnificent spectacle. I am just glad no one was inside, though, cuz that stuff burns hot.”

A spokesman for the Treasury Department, speaking on condition of anonymity, said it would take at least six months to restart production of US paper money.

The White House announced plans to temporarily halt production of pennies and begin production of $1.00 and $5.00 copper coins from the US Mint until the “problem can be resolved”. The President stressed in his public address this afternoon that the effects of this attack were “more symbolic than real”, and we can continue to do business as usual. Stating that there is “plenty of currency in the marketplace and normal production of currency will resume shortly”.

The marketplace, however, did not seem to agree. Upon hearing that the US Dollar had suddenly become a rare commodity, the value of the dollar skyrocketed on world markets today. In Japan the dollar rose $.50 against the Yen, in London the Dollar rose $.75 against the Pound, and in Germany the Dollar rose $.35 against the Euro. In Chicago this morning, which has become the US market center since they reopened after the attack on the NYSE, the day opened with an initial panic selling causing the Dow to drop 500 points in an hour, but news of the increased strength of the dollar worldwide turned the tide. The day closing with the Dow up 100 points over yesterday’s close.

The ‘Robin Hood Gang’ released their first statement today; the full text is currently being withheld at the FBI’s request while they study its value as evidence. While we at the Post-Times are believers in free speech, we are also not interested in furthering criminal activity. We can however summarize the statement for you until a decision is made about its release in the future.

They stated that this was to be their last strike. They claimed they were not traitors or revolutionaries, but citizens who simply desired accountability. They do not feel that their actions were inclusive of all those who are responsible for this crisis, but that they had made their point. They then go on to provide what can only be called a manifesto of complaints and ideals for how a nation should be run. While the statement is well thought out, one cannot help but contemplate the hubris required to offer such a diatribe to a nation whose best and brightest has spent so much time considering these very issues.

If they indeed keep their promise to cease activities, what will happen to the FBI’s investigation, which has made little progress to date? And what will come of the grass roots support that has developed over the past few weeks for their activities? Most importantly, how will the damage they inflicted to the US fiscal infrastructure effect our economy long term and will they ever suffer accountability for their own actions?

JD Adler
WPA

April 14, 2009

OpEd: ‘Robin Hood’ and the Social Contract

Philadelphia, Pa
World Press Association
May 9, 2009


In the wake of the recent attacks by the ‘Robin Hood’ gang, as well as the copy cat attacks around the country, one has to ask us what does all this mean? Clearly there is the most shallow of observations, people are angry. This is not news, nor did it take these attacks to discover either. People have been angry for some time; angry about a government which seems to not hear them, angry about paying taxes without receiving anything in return, angry about fighting wars that seem to have no purpose, and generally angry about living in a country that has seems to have lost its way without finding a new one.

What is so different now that people are willing to turn to away from the system, or praise those who do? Is it simply the feeling of having been robbed? Or is it that the government appears to be in collusion with the robbers? Or perhaps it’s just that our collective welfare appears to depend on the machinations of a few people who don’t really care?

If the Fed had raised interest rates in 2006 when the housing bubble was leveling off, it would have spelled the end for the hedge fund bubble but all the people on subprime loans could have refinanced as they had planned and the mortgage crisis could have been avoided. Since the Fed kept interest rates low, hedge funds kept growing until their inevitable collapse on the heels of the mortgage crisis caused the credit crisis. What’s more, the only reason they were able to offer these subprime loans and hedge fund derivatives is because the last two administrations removed the rules that prevented it. And now Washington tells us they must bailout the very same businesses that did this to our country by having the Fed pour more money into the marketplace.

What’s more is that the same people who hold jobs, and pay their mortgage, and pay taxes, are the one’s who are going to be funding this bailout in the long run… and know it. It’s one thing to ask me to assist a down on her luck mother of three with some food stamps and welfare checks, its another thing entirely to ask me to help a multibillion dollar corporation that just crashed the economy without suffering any personal consequences.

That last part really seems to be the crux of the matter. Maybe the reason people like the idea of a modern day Robin Hood taking out vigilante justice is because the actual justice system doesn’t appear to be. Time Magazine put out a list of 25 names responsible for the current fiscal crisis, other than Bernie Madoff who turned himself in when he realized he lost everything, no one on that list has faced indictment. When will there be consequences for destroying our economy in a way that was completely avoidable?

Civil unrest occurs when the government fails to uphold its end of the social contract.

JD Adler
WPA

April 10, 2009

Copycat Robin Hoods Disrupt Financial Industry

Washington, DC
World Press Association
May 1, 2009


Since the string of attacks by the ‘Robin Hood’ gang last month against people and organizations closely associated with the recent financial troubles, copycat attacks have begun to spring up around the country.

In Philadelphia, the Sunoco refinery was firebombed. In Detroit, the headquarters of GM were attacked, in the middle of the day, with flash-bang grenades; the perpetrators then fired red paintballs at the stunned employees. Across the country, 327 banks have been burned, bombed, or assaulted in some way over the last two weeks.

Unlike the Robin Hood Gang, these copycats have resulted in numerous injuries and 4 dead.

Also unlike the originals, these copycats are indiscriminate in their targets. Anything and anyone remotely associated with the financial sector seems to have become a target of the hostility the general public feels. The Robin Hood Gang was very specific in targeting people for whom there was already a preponderance of evidence as to their participation in creating these problems. Even the attack on the NYSE last week followed that logic as it has been the hedge funds and futures traders that created the oil price bubble, the housing bubble, and who profited off the collapse of those bubbles.

However indiscriminate attacks on people who happen to be working in our financial sector is not vigilantism for they are not criminals, it is just anarchy. It does, however, demonstrate a clear desire among for someone to be accountable for what has happened coupled with a lack of knowledge as to who that should be.

While extralegal activities and violence in general should never be condoned, the popularity of the actions of the Robin Hood Gang is worthy of review. A recent Lugner Poll showed that 60% of Americans agree that the targets of the Robin Hood Gang should be held accountable, 48% agreed with their actions, and only 20% thought they should be tried for treason.

So what are the implications of this? Are these financial criminals group of malicious men who need to be punished so that we can go back to our way of life? Or, as some suggest, is this endemic to our system and requiring a more fundamental response? The Republicans offer the Australian school of laissez faire economics as the answer. The Democrats say Keynesian economics with its heavy reliance on government meditation of the market is the answer. We have been living under a mixture of these two plans for almost 100 years, in which time the stock market has crashed more times than I can count. Every time that the market crashes, the economy crashes.

Perhaps the stock market is the problem.

JD Adler
WPA